Initial implementation
This commit is contained in:
111
test-notes/projects/research-notes.org
Normal file
111
test-notes/projects/research-notes.org
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
||||
#+TITLE: Research Notes
|
||||
#+AUTHOR: Research Team
|
||||
#+CATEGORY: research
|
||||
#+TAGS: research analysis data
|
||||
|
||||
* Literature Review
|
||||
** Org Mode Studies
|
||||
*** "Org Mode as Knowledge Management System" :paper:
|
||||
**** Abstract
|
||||
This paper explores the use of org-mode for personal knowledge management.
|
||||
|
||||
**** Key Findings
|
||||
- Structured text improves information retrieval
|
||||
- Hierarchical organization aids comprehension
|
||||
- Plain text format ensures longevity
|
||||
|
||||
**** Methodology
|
||||
The study involved 50 participants using org-mode for 6 months.
|
||||
|
||||
***** Data Collection
|
||||
- Weekly surveys
|
||||
- Usage analytics
|
||||
- Interview sessions
|
||||
|
||||
***** Analysis
|
||||
Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements in:
|
||||
1. Information organization
|
||||
2. Task completion rates
|
||||
3. Note-taking efficiency
|
||||
|
||||
*** "Tree Visualization of Hierarchical Data" :paper:
|
||||
**** Research Question
|
||||
How do different tree visualization methods affect user comprehension?
|
||||
|
||||
**** Experiments
|
||||
***** Experiment 1: Static vs Interactive Trees
|
||||
Interactive trees showed 23% better comprehension scores.
|
||||
|
||||
***** Experiment 2: Vertical vs Horizontal Layout
|
||||
No significant difference in comprehension, but users preferred vertical layout.
|
||||
|
||||
* Data Analysis
|
||||
** User Feedback
|
||||
*** Survey Results
|
||||
**** Satisfaction Ratings
|
||||
- Ease of use: 4.2/5
|
||||
- Visual clarity: 4.5/5
|
||||
- Performance: 3.8/5
|
||||
|
||||
**** Common Requests
|
||||
1. Better mobile support
|
||||
2. Collaborative editing
|
||||
3. Integration with other tools
|
||||
|
||||
*** Usability Testing
|
||||
**** Task Completion Times
|
||||
***** File Import
|
||||
Average: 12 seconds (target: < 10 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
***** Node Editing
|
||||
Average: 8 seconds (target: < 5 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
***** Export Function
|
||||
Average: 6 seconds (meets target)
|
||||
|
||||
* Future Research Directions
|
||||
** Enhanced Visualization
|
||||
*** 3D Tree Representations
|
||||
Explore whether 3D visualization improves understanding of deep hierarchies.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Color Coding Systems
|
||||
Investigate optimal color schemes for different node types.
|
||||
|
||||
** Performance Optimization
|
||||
*** Lazy Loading
|
||||
Implement progressive loading for large org files.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Virtual Scrolling
|
||||
Handle thousands of nodes without performance degradation.
|
||||
|
||||
** User Experience
|
||||
*** Accessibility Features
|
||||
- Screen reader compatibility
|
||||
- Keyboard-only navigation
|
||||
- High contrast modes
|
||||
|
||||
*** Mobile Interface
|
||||
Design touch-friendly interaction patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
* Methodology Notes
|
||||
** Data Collection Protocol
|
||||
*** Participant Recruitment
|
||||
Target users: knowledge workers who use structured documents
|
||||
|
||||
*** Metrics
|
||||
**** Quantitative
|
||||
- Task completion time
|
||||
- Error rates
|
||||
- Feature usage frequency
|
||||
|
||||
**** Qualitative
|
||||
- User satisfaction surveys
|
||||
- Interview feedback
|
||||
- Observation notes
|
||||
|
||||
** Analysis Framework
|
||||
*** Statistical Methods
|
||||
Use ANOVA for comparing group means across different conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Thematic Analysis
|
||||
Code qualitative feedback to identify common themes and patterns.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user