Initial implementation
This commit is contained in:
57
test-notes/projects/orgtree-project.org
Normal file
57
test-notes/projects/orgtree-project.org
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||
#+TITLE: OrgTree Project
|
||||
#+AUTHOR: Development Team
|
||||
#+DATE: 2024-01-01
|
||||
#+TAGS: project development vue
|
||||
|
||||
* Project Overview
|
||||
OrgTree is a web-based interface for visualizing org-mode files as interactive trees.
|
||||
|
||||
** Goals
|
||||
- [ ] Create intuitive tree visualization
|
||||
- [X] Support file import/export
|
||||
- [ ] Enable real-time editing
|
||||
|
||||
** Technical Stack
|
||||
*** Frontend
|
||||
- Vue.js 3 with TypeScript
|
||||
- Tailwind CSS for styling
|
||||
- Vite for build tooling
|
||||
|
||||
*** Backend (Future)
|
||||
- Node.js with Express
|
||||
- Database for persistence
|
||||
|
||||
* Development Phases
|
||||
** Phase 1: Core Implementation :DONE:
|
||||
Basic functionality is working.
|
||||
|
||||
*** File Parser
|
||||
The parser handles standard org-mode syntax including:
|
||||
- Headings with multiple levels
|
||||
- TODO states
|
||||
- Tags and properties
|
||||
- Content blocks
|
||||
|
||||
** Phase 2: Advanced Features :CURRENT:
|
||||
*** Drag and Drop
|
||||
Enable users to reorganize tree structure visually.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Node Management
|
||||
- Add new nodes
|
||||
- Delete existing nodes
|
||||
- Modify node properties
|
||||
|
||||
** Phase 3: Polish :FUTURE:
|
||||
*** Performance
|
||||
Optimize for large org files with hundreds of nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Accessibility
|
||||
Ensure keyboard navigation and screen reader support.
|
||||
|
||||
* Notes
|
||||
** Implementation Details
|
||||
The current parsing approach uses regex-based extraction which works well for standard org-mode files.
|
||||
|
||||
** Known Issues
|
||||
- Large files may cause performance problems
|
||||
- Some advanced org-mode features not yet supported
|
||||
111
test-notes/projects/research-notes.org
Normal file
111
test-notes/projects/research-notes.org
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
||||
#+TITLE: Research Notes
|
||||
#+AUTHOR: Research Team
|
||||
#+CATEGORY: research
|
||||
#+TAGS: research analysis data
|
||||
|
||||
* Literature Review
|
||||
** Org Mode Studies
|
||||
*** "Org Mode as Knowledge Management System" :paper:
|
||||
**** Abstract
|
||||
This paper explores the use of org-mode for personal knowledge management.
|
||||
|
||||
**** Key Findings
|
||||
- Structured text improves information retrieval
|
||||
- Hierarchical organization aids comprehension
|
||||
- Plain text format ensures longevity
|
||||
|
||||
**** Methodology
|
||||
The study involved 50 participants using org-mode for 6 months.
|
||||
|
||||
***** Data Collection
|
||||
- Weekly surveys
|
||||
- Usage analytics
|
||||
- Interview sessions
|
||||
|
||||
***** Analysis
|
||||
Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements in:
|
||||
1. Information organization
|
||||
2. Task completion rates
|
||||
3. Note-taking efficiency
|
||||
|
||||
*** "Tree Visualization of Hierarchical Data" :paper:
|
||||
**** Research Question
|
||||
How do different tree visualization methods affect user comprehension?
|
||||
|
||||
**** Experiments
|
||||
***** Experiment 1: Static vs Interactive Trees
|
||||
Interactive trees showed 23% better comprehension scores.
|
||||
|
||||
***** Experiment 2: Vertical vs Horizontal Layout
|
||||
No significant difference in comprehension, but users preferred vertical layout.
|
||||
|
||||
* Data Analysis
|
||||
** User Feedback
|
||||
*** Survey Results
|
||||
**** Satisfaction Ratings
|
||||
- Ease of use: 4.2/5
|
||||
- Visual clarity: 4.5/5
|
||||
- Performance: 3.8/5
|
||||
|
||||
**** Common Requests
|
||||
1. Better mobile support
|
||||
2. Collaborative editing
|
||||
3. Integration with other tools
|
||||
|
||||
*** Usability Testing
|
||||
**** Task Completion Times
|
||||
***** File Import
|
||||
Average: 12 seconds (target: < 10 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
***** Node Editing
|
||||
Average: 8 seconds (target: < 5 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
***** Export Function
|
||||
Average: 6 seconds (meets target)
|
||||
|
||||
* Future Research Directions
|
||||
** Enhanced Visualization
|
||||
*** 3D Tree Representations
|
||||
Explore whether 3D visualization improves understanding of deep hierarchies.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Color Coding Systems
|
||||
Investigate optimal color schemes for different node types.
|
||||
|
||||
** Performance Optimization
|
||||
*** Lazy Loading
|
||||
Implement progressive loading for large org files.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Virtual Scrolling
|
||||
Handle thousands of nodes without performance degradation.
|
||||
|
||||
** User Experience
|
||||
*** Accessibility Features
|
||||
- Screen reader compatibility
|
||||
- Keyboard-only navigation
|
||||
- High contrast modes
|
||||
|
||||
*** Mobile Interface
|
||||
Design touch-friendly interaction patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
* Methodology Notes
|
||||
** Data Collection Protocol
|
||||
*** Participant Recruitment
|
||||
Target users: knowledge workers who use structured documents
|
||||
|
||||
*** Metrics
|
||||
**** Quantitative
|
||||
- Task completion time
|
||||
- Error rates
|
||||
- Feature usage frequency
|
||||
|
||||
**** Qualitative
|
||||
- User satisfaction surveys
|
||||
- Interview feedback
|
||||
- Observation notes
|
||||
|
||||
** Analysis Framework
|
||||
*** Statistical Methods
|
||||
Use ANOVA for comparing group means across different conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
*** Thematic Analysis
|
||||
Code qualitative feedback to identify common themes and patterns.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user